Minor correction to previous post: 2% not 0.02 %. That would have been quite a miracle. Alex.
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 1:11:35 PM UTC+1, AlexTsekenis wrote: > Hi kay, > > We have been able to achieve a precision of 1.5mm - 2mm (depending on how > you define the boundary of the glow) with the IN-13 tube and after taking > several measures: binning, cathodic sputtering and dual-region transfer > function compensation. The length of the main cathode is 120mm so that's > better than 0.02%. We have found several tubes in say a lot of 100 are > 'gassy' and notably change characteristics even within a week. We still > need to try baking them. > > Regards, > Alex > > > > On Monday, May 21, 2012 12:35:54 PM UTC+1, kay486 wrote: > >> Hi there, ive been wondering, how precise can you be when you drive >> those tubes? Ive been thinking recently that they would make a really nice >> clock! Having six or seven tubes next to each other. The thing i need to >> know is if its possible with these tubes to have ten precisely given >> points. That way you could use them for clock pretty easily. You could even >> achieve neat effect if the transitions between every number would be smooth >> so the glow would simply grow. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/45953d1e-f449-49e8-8654-9961286eefff%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
