well even ZM1042 / Z5660M look so much better than IN-18, there is a huge 
difference in quality/appearance when it comes to the russina tubes.

On Thursday, 4 September 2014 20:22:34 UTC+1, gregebert wrote:
>
> I'm sure some nixie zealots might disagree with me here, but in my opinion 
> the cost vs. size math doesn't justify spending* that* much on a 50mm 
> tube. The IN-18 tubes are an impressive 40mm, for about 1/10 the cost.
>
> Despite a few temptations, I have stayed away from digits larger than 
> 20mm, partly for cost reasons, but also because the large digits seem 
> skinny & dim compared to smaller tubes. It appears that cathodes are not 
> made 'fatter' for larger tubes, probably because that would impair 
> visibility of other digits and they would also reflect more.
>
> I see 'Fake Gigantic Nixies'  in my future.....
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/9331cd0c-ccc9-4536-810f-b14a6a740e5a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to