> Ok, John shamed me into tweaking the layout. That wasn't really my goal, but you did ask for comments.
> Here's the latest revs. I did address the lines crossing the hole keepouts, > as well as rationalizing out a whole bunch of vias. My criteria for a clean > design includes as few as possible jogs in the traces, minimal number of vias > within reason, and an adherence to x on one layer and y on the other.... > until the routing is done, then around the margins, it becomes OK to violate > that rule. Symmetrical layouts of repeated circuitry. Also only 45 degree > bends, (90 or 45 at vias OK) clean pad entry, (no acid traps), trace widths > no narrower than the design justifies... very conservative rules. Makes for > high yields and reliable boards. Anyway, now I'm pretty happy with both of > these boards, and after some careful design validation, I'll be ready to > order boards. So your feedback, please. I really like this version! Those are really satisfying layouts! - John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/FA7EF1BA-DEDA-40F9-A5D1-0F44126164F5%40mac.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
