Thanks for the thoughts, Nick. I haven't done long term burn in constantly
at full scale, which I will give a try. I have given these tubes around
12-18 hours of use in a VU-Meter circuit, which has been pretty reliably
bouncing up to 80% scale regularly and I haven't seen a change in bias
current.

On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Nicholas Stock <[email protected]> wrote:

> Bill, I'm by no means an expert on this, but from what I've gleaned with
> the IN-13 tubes is that they sometimes need a little bit of over current to
> get them 'settled/conditioned'..after which you can use them full scale
> according to specs..try burning one in for a while then reducing the
> current and seeing what happens...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nick
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Bill Esposito <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hey everyone -- It's been a long time since I've posted to this group (or
>> played with Nixies for that matter).
>>
>> I've built an IN-13 driver circuit, using a topology that seems to be the
>> "canonical" one most commonly floating around the web, using an opamp and
>> an MPSA42 -- see the linked schematic:
>>
>> http://puu.sh/iNgTq/3f60ecf956.jpg
>>
>> All values are measured full scale indication conditions. I'm using a
>> Taylor Edge supply module set at 146V (as indicated on the schematic; I
>> know my handwritten 4s looks like 9s to some people). I originally had it
>> set at 140V, but one of my tubes wasn't reliably striking at 140V, so I
>> changed the set resistance.
>>
>> Thing is, all the documents on the IN13 that I've seen indicate that the
>> control current should be on the order of 0-5mA. With the tubes I've got on
>> hand (I've tried this on 3) the control current required has been on the
>> order of 13mA to get the bargraph to indicate full scale.
>>
>> The question is, why to I need 3x the rated current to get full scale? It
>> seems like I MUST be doing something wrong, but I'm not seeing what it
>> could be. I suspect this isn't good for the tubes long term, but I'm also
>> not sure how bad it is.
>>
>> As an aside, I tried 392k resistors on the cathodes and those gave me a
>> slightly less linear sweep but overshoots the full scale indication
>> slightly, which is nice. If there's no long term harm in upping that
>> resistance, I'll probably go back to the 392k resistors.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Bill
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "neonixie-l" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CABKLWSFP%3DrReVhHnWMORsRKQxBU2rjuHZw2nL-fG3Gn0V%3DBWcw%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CABKLWSFP%3DrReVhHnWMORsRKQxBU2rjuHZw2nL-fG3Gn0V%3DBWcw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "neonixie-l" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAOX%2BRHL-5%3D%3DEDfeVemBe7b2N%3DoTDR1-aFnqQLhRQ42hZ%2BzdimA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAOX%2BRHL-5%3D%3DEDfeVemBe7b2N%3DoTDR1-aFnqQLhRQ42hZ%2BzdimA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CABKLWSG6U3EepKFNS9rgLA9AxSw%2BArr08-B0judbg0djqnqSxw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to