You guys have made me curious now about the other 'good' clock I have of 
his. I'm going to open it up and see if there are any other differences 
other than the obvious being tube board I used vs. the 'stock' one.

On Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 10:26:30 PM UTC-7, johnk wrote:
>
> Michael, I have to comment on the logic here.
>
> You say you have one that is quite OK and seem to use that fact to rule 
> out the effects mentioned by Nick. Actually, I consider that the parasitic 
> oscillations idea is reinforced by your fact, not denied by it.   When a 
> circuit is on the verge of misbehaving there will be some that are OK and 
> some that aren’t.
>
> Obviously I can’t tell from here what the actual fault is.
>
>  
>
> Capacitors.  I am interested in the topic. Low ESR electrolytics are a 
> curse. [Remember that fuss about the “stolen” formula not being complete 
> and all the computer manufacturers being affected?] Some do seem to last 
> better than expected. Some fail quickly. The LED lighting industry is 
> possibly going to cause improvements. Those tiny electros that they hide in 
> the base of the globe really are stressed. And some sellers still quote the 
> expected LED life as that for the power supply too !     Oops.  [And 
> Australian consumer law provides for lifetime warranty btw, regardless of 
> what the manufacturer states. And we beat up Steam to the point that they 
> allow returns!]
>
> I am very interested in hearing about how well different brands and types 
> of capacitor perform. Anyone tried non-electros? 
>
> I have noticed that some switching supplies driving discharge tubes for TV 
> and laptop backlighting [yeah, old ones, not LED ones] use monolithic solid 
> caps. One I fixed had only 2uF though iirc.  A pity that opamp capacitor 
> multipliers don’t store energy J .
>
>  
>
> John K
>
> Australia 
>
> *From:* [email protected] <javascript:> [mailto:
> [email protected] <javascript:>] *On Behalf Of *MichaelB
> *Sent:* Sunday, 7 April 2019 11:06
> *To:* neonixie-l
> *Subject:* Re: [neonixie-l] Another Tube Hobby Failure
>
>  
>
> HI Nick, 
>
>  
>
> I know you have mentioned that before, but I really don’t think anything 
> else is wrong. As I said I have another one of these with 566M tubes and it 
> has worked flawlessly for 8+ years. Those electronics are in a similar 
> enclosure with less ventilation. And this is the second set of electronics 
> i have tried in this enclosure thinking there might be something internally 
> wrong with the PCB. (I had that problem with one of my Thomas clocks way 
> back when) But, I believe others have had issues with these electronics. 
> Another variable vs. your clocks might be that I have wired in a pair of 
> NE-2 Colons in parallel vs. the stock config that uses just one per each 
> side. I doubt that would be an issue, but it may account for a slightly 
> greater current demand.  I don't think these clocks like anything, but an 
> open air set up. Also, the close proximity of the 5V VREG and the IRF640 is 
> somewhat suspect from a heat dissipation perspective. Anyway…I used a 
> higher voltage capacity electrolytic this time, maybe I’ll this'll give me 
> another year or so :-). and I will try your idea of adding a heat sink to 
> the VREG, since heat seems to be the culprit here. Thx Nick
>
>  
>
>  
>
> On Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 6:06:36 PM UTC-7, Pramanicin wrote:
>
> Something else is awry there Michael. I have a friend with a TubeHobby 
> IN18 that i built for him that’s been running for well over 6 years now 
> with no issues. The only modification i ever made was putting an extra 
> heatsink on the regulator as what was there (board plane) didn’t seem 
> sufficient to me (just a hunch, I’m sure Jonas knew what he was doing..)....
>
>  
>
> Hope you get it sorted!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Apr 6, 2019, at 17:15, MichaelB <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This makes 4 times now this clock has failed over the past 10 years or so. 
> This is a stock clock with IN-18's. I have another set of these electronics 
> that has never failed, but then again, I had changed the tube board to 
> accommodate the Z566M tube. Different current demands? It has worked like a 
> charm for years now. The failure with the IN-8 clock this time was a leaky 
> C6. In the past the inductor has failed, but usually its one of the 
> electrolytics in the Pwr supply stage. It's become kind of a ritual where 
> every 2-3 years I have to pull the clock apart and play detective and 
> figure out what's wrong after its starts blowing fuses. Kind of fun now, 
> actually! 
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "neonixie-l" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/07394dde-1d45-4e3f-a38a-75ca15d16c48%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/07394dde-1d45-4e3f-a38a-75ca15d16c48%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> <Tube Hobby Pwr Supply Schem..jpeg>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "neonixie-l" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/22340da1-4f58-4673-bb1d-a9bdebb8fd14%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/22340da1-4f58-4673-bb1d-a9bdebb8fd14%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/729e1058-12f9-414f-853b-54f24edcec83%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to