Hmm. My recollection from high school physics was that the speed of 
propagation along a wave guide was around 90% the speed of light - 
presumably limited by the dielectric. Signals along a plain old wire, on 
the other hand, were more like 1/3 the speed of light. Now I'm going to 
have to double-check that for the first time in over 40 years!

On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 2:20:06 PM UTC-5 Chuck wrote:

> A handy way I use, to remember the approximate speed of light, which is 
> also the approximate
>
> speed at which an electrical signal travels in a wire is just to think of 
> it
>
> as 1 nanosecond per foot.   Approximately.
>  
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: "gregebert" <[email protected]>
> Sent: 12/27/2020 12:32:41 AM
> To: "neonixie-l" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [neonixie-l] How close together do a controller and crystal 
> need to be?
>  
> I'm assuming you are routing the output signal of an oscillator, not the 
> crystal signals themselves.
>  
> The rise- & fall-times of the clock signal will determine how long the 
> trace can be without termination. Faster edge-rates, say in the 2-3nsec 
> range, will limit your trace to around 1 inch.
> Signals propagate around 150psec/inch, and if the rise/fall times are 
> about 10x (or larger) longer than the flight-time, then reflections should 
> not have sufficient amplitude to cause false clocking.
>  
> In the example above, 1 inch of trace has a round-trip flight-time of 
> 300psec. If the rise and fall delays are 3nsec or larger, you can safely 
> use 1 inch of trace without using termination networks or 
> controlled-impedance traces.
>  
> SPICE simulations are very helpful when deciding how to design clock lines 
> when you cant satisfy the above rule.
> On Saturday, December 26, 2020 at 4:06:26 PM UTC-8 Bill van Dijk wrote:
>
>> As long as there is not something very noisy on the other side of the 
>> board you’ll be just fine.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On 
>> Behalf Of *Erick Anderson
>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 26, 2020 6:53 PM
>> *To:* neonixie-l <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* [neonixie-l] How close together do a controller and crystal 
>> need to be?
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>> I designed a board for the 6-digit All Spectrum controller, which uses 
>> the Dallas TCXO chip. That's what goes in the DIP-14 socket in the picture. 
>> Right now they're as close to each other as possible. I'm thinking about 
>> redesigning the board to be a bit shorter, and moving the socket into the 
>> empty space at the right of the board would help. This would make the clock 
>> signal trace much longer, but is that actually a problem?
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "neonixie-l" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/1bbc978e-4883-4b0e-920f-d5f3ff4c4c2cn%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/1bbc978e-4883-4b0e-920f-d5f3ff4c4c2cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "neonixie-l" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
>
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/bbe8ae0a-bb3c-4f4a-98f6-9f56bc1e1805n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/bbe8ae0a-bb3c-4f4a-98f6-9f56bc1e1805n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/480dcaf7-ce2b-45be-b8cc-bb1ee79bc5a2n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to