@Jon,
yes, I will share the code. I have moved it to the VS Code IDE with 
PlatformIO. I do not like the Arduino IDE much. It should run on david's 
hardware, too.
Do yo you have build the hardware already?

On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 5:12:46 AM UTC+1 David Forbes wrote:

> I was able to change to a Teensy 4.1 with a 2 channel 12 bit SPI DAC in my 
> latest version. I had to reduce the DAC rate by half. It looks just as good 
> as the old version. Of course, the DAC I chise is already unobtanium.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023, 7:17 AM jörg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi, maybe a bit offtopic.
>>
>> I've put some effort in using the teensy4.x to run the scope clock based 
>> on david forbes one.
>> The teensy3.6 based one is running on my own hardware for a while.
>>
>> But because of CPU shortage and the use of the teensy3.6 internal DAC's, 
>> I was curious to get the stuff up and running on the faster teensy 4.x CPU.
>> In this approach I'm using a parallel driven 12 bit 4 channels DAC. The 
>> usage of a serial DAC was too slow and I did not get DMA up and running on 
>> teensy4.x.
>> Anyway, this works and I like it.
>>
>> Video: https://youtu.be/HYwgyYnQUxw
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "neonixie-l" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/a2701743-2b9b-4543-a0c0-32b8b90da85an%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/a2701743-2b9b-4543-a0c0-32b8b90da85an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/bc1f2bea-aa6f-4890-bcc9-4b3104b444c7n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to