On Thursday 22 October 2009 12:43:55 Ben Martin wrote: > Hi, > As I'm tinkering with a new backend design for soprano I'm wondering > what folks use to benchmark nepomuk for KDE4 usage? > > Do folks just use the generic RDF benchmarking: > http://esw.w3.org/topic/RdfStoreBenchmarking > when comparing sesame2 to virtuoso backend for example? >
folks, in this case me, don't do much benchmarking at all. So far there was no real need for it since there has never been any choice: in the beginning we only had redland. You know that it is slow by using it for a few days. No need for a benchmark. Then we had sesame2 which is deprecated by Virtuoso simply because the latter has so many advantages. Performance is not even in the top 5. ;) But benchmarking seems like a good idea. And why not start with the standard one. Any chance that could be integrated into the Soprano model unit test? Cheers, Sebastian _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
