Well, maybe the simplest solution would be to ask the user on unmount. Let them decide if we want to keep the data, make it portable, or remove it....
On 06/15/2010 01:14 PM, Daniel Winter wrote: > That way the only problem would be the filex thing? (Rewriting a few > thousand or tens of thousands of file resources sounds very slow to > me) > > Am I still missing something about that filex thing? Keep in mind that only the nie:url properties need to be rewritten. While this might still be slow at the moment there is room for improvement with the next Virtuoso iteration which should bring us much better graph support in SPARUL. Cheers, Sebastian _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
