2010/6/21 Sebastian Trüg <[email protected]> > The thing is that I would like the make the facet stuff public API for > KDE 4.6. That is why I am picking on it and being a pita. :P > > :D Then I can search a different term for "Term", but "Facet" must retain its name, which is its academia name :)
> Do you actually want to create different representations for different > types of facets. The only exception I can see is the rating. But that > could easily be filtered out and added as a separate gui element. > > Well, currently my answer should be "yes" (looking at Sembrowser), but actually is "no": in the Web world, faceted browsing does not use different representations for facets, it uses a uniform one, so in the end I am for uniform representation also here :) The only thing I am objecting here is that a model should support only one facet (or one facetgroup, following your name), because I really don't know if it makes sense to show more than one facet in the same UI. Even if you use the same representation (say, a listview), then each listview should have its model instance, and each model instance should have one facet, and each facet n terms. -- Sivieri Alessandro [email protected] http://www.chimera-bellerofonte.eu/ http://www.poul.org/
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
