not crazy at all. This was the plan in the original Nepomuk research project. Only they never managed to make it work properly.
On 06/28/2010 10:52 PM, Artem Serebriyskiy wrote: > Some crazy idea( really crazy ): > What about using some kind of p2p network for sharing metadata ? It > might be usefull for sharing public metadata - for example information > about music, about books, about films. > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Vishesh Handa <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hello Oszkar > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Oszkar Ambrus <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Vishesh, > > On 28 June 2010 18:50, Vishesh Handa <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Metadata sharing implies that we should be able to see other > people's > > metadata and have it on are own system. Sebastian suggested > that we store > > user information ( who owns which statements ) as graph > metadata. That's > > totally feasible, and maybe we could also store the permission > settings as > > graph metadata. > > I'm thinking of permissions settings similar to how you share stuff > through Samba. > You can share your stuff with guests (i.e. everyone, without > authentication), with all known users (stored locally) or with a > subset of existing users. > The list of users could be stored locally as RDF and then, similarly > to what Sebastian suggested, statements can be annotated with the > graph meta-data to specify privileges. > > > Yes. I had something similar in mind. > > > > > I'm not too sure how we would choose whose metadata to store > our on system > > or why we would need to do that. > > As for whose meta-data to store, would you like to go with a > high-level protocol, such as Jabber? So no low-level stuff? > > > Forget about Jabber. I think it would be better to go with > Telepathy. Daniele [0] is working on "Telepathy Tubes and File > Transfer in KDE", and it would be a lot better to support multiple > protocols via Telepathy instead just supporting Jabber. Once his > project is complete we should be able to export a Dbus interface to > other contacts, so that greatly simplifies the problem of how to > connect/transfer stuff between 2 machines. > > Please look at the attached conversation. > > > Because, as I understood, the RDF repository is going to be exposed > through HTTP, so you could connect to anyone's repository and just > insert their address in the graph metadata of the statements you > store > locally. > > > No, I don't think we should expose it via HTTP. ( Might be > problematic ) There is a project in the playground called nsqd > (Nepomuk Social Query Daemon ), which does something similar. I'll > take a look at it. > > - Vishesh Handa > > [0] http://blogs.fsfe.org/drdanz/ > > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours, > Artem > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
