as a sidenote: I have the plan for a long meeting at the akademy with the only topic "data sharing". We should probably figure out when we want to do that.
On 06/28/2010 07:50 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > I wanted to start with Metadata Sharing, but I don't have a clear idea > as to what it entails or how I'd go about it. So I thought we could > discuss it. :) > > This is what we have so far - > 1. Jabber should be used to connect to another user's system. > 2. We should be able to perform queries on another users system, > connected via Jabber. > 3. Some form of privacy lists which filter other users searches and only > return the content the user wants sharable. > > Jabber is a nice way of sending the sparql query. but maybe we could > look into other things like UPnP. Anyway, that's a secondary concern. > > Metadata sharing implies that we should be able to see other people's > metadata and have it on are own system. Sebastian suggested that we > store user information ( who owns which statements ) as graph metadata. > That's totally feasible, and maybe we could also store the permission > settings as graph metadata. > > I'm not too sure how we would choose whose metadata to store our on > system or why we would need to do that. I always thought we would have > something like this -> Search for a person John Doe, turns out we have a > contact by that name but a friend of ours has some pictures in which he > has been tagged. On further investigation we find that we have the same > pictures. (or we could get those photos , file sharing? ) Then we *sync* > the metadata of those pictures. With the current backup-sync framework > that syncing part is possible, but maybe this is where we would store > the other user's metadata on our system AND mark them as created/owned > by that user. (Sharing?) > > Any thoughts? > > - Vishesh Handa _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
