On Thursday 09 September 2010 00:52:34 Alessandro Sivieri wrote: > Just had a mad idea, so I want to ask a question: if I want to represent a > note in Nepomuk, how should I represent it? I looked at the ontologies, so > I suppose it should be a pimo:Note, with its contents in a property of > type nao:Description, right? At least, this is what is written in the pimo > documentation...
The way nepomuk annotations work mostly resembles that of a scientific paper: * subject * title * description * abstract(currently missing but who knows for how long) * text content Basically each item in the list can be characterized simply as "description of the content which is an order of magnitude more detailed compared to the item above": subject: 1-2 words title: 5-10 words description: a long sentence or a paragraph abstract: a paragraph or a page text content: everything there is So, the content of *anything* is stored as nie:plaintextContent or nie:htmlContent(I guess we should finally put this into the standard). Everything else(description etc) is just an annotation of the content. If PIMO documentation contradicts this somewhere, let me know... -- Evgeny _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
