On 09/21/2010 12:34 PM, Laura Dragan wrote: > On Tuesday 21 September 2010 09:30:19 Sebastian Trüg wrote: >> Hi Amir, >> >> looks like I missed this one. So here goes. >> >> On 09/14/2010 06:50 PM, Amir Pakdel wrote: >>> The last prombems were: >>> >>> 1. >>> >>> I havd to update Krunner Nepomuk plugin to the last version >>> >>> 2. >>> >>> There is a /22rdfsyntaxnsmetadata/ function in /rdf/ which I had >>> to comment out >> >> Is this something Nepomuk-related? Something that did not work or might >> need fixing from my part? >> >>> I have attached latest version of /src/nepomukintegration.h/ and >>> /src/nepomukintegration.cpp/ and I would be greateful if you could take >>> look and inform me of any error, bug or requred features. >> >> Some comments: >> - It is recommended to use KUrl(path) instead of >> QUrl::fromLocalFile(path) >> - setProperty( "a" ) is very very wrong. :) What you want to do is >> calling addType() >> - there is no need to add nfo:FileDataObject type manually. That is >> already handled by strigi and Resource. The same goes for nie:url >> - nfo:fileUrl is deprecated in favor of nie:url. >> - Please do not use DC. Rather use nie:title. >> - use setLabel() instead of setProperty( NAO::prefLabel(), >> >>> Here is the updated and reformatted testing procedure: >> >> I am not sure what to do with the explanations below. Is that for manual >> testing? >> >> >>> Trüg, do you know why I cannot find tags? >>> Laura, what metadata do you suggest to add next? > > Hi Amir, > > There are some things which are not completely clear to me. > From what I see in the code, you consider a .basket as a note. > I see the basket as a container of multiple notes, each distinct instances of > pimo:Note, each with it's own creation/modification times and tags. I'm not > sure about the title, as I don't know if you can set the title of an > individual note in any other way as through formatting in the text. And then > there are the groups of notes, which I think would make sense to capture as > RDF as they are structured info as well. > > @nepomuk What vocabulary offers support for this kinds of containers of > Things already? > As a last resort, you could even make up your own small vocabulary for it.
Well, we do have pimo:isPartOf, right? Cheers, Sebastian _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
