The solution is simply what I said: we support the tracker API and that's it. The other way around is not possible anyway.
Cheers, Sebastian On 11/09/2010 08:46 PM, Richard Dale wrote: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Sebastian Trüg <[email protected]> wrote: >> while you can this is pointless when it comes to compatibility between >> Gnome and KDE. Nepomuk in KDE uses named graphs to store data and >> metadata about the data. This is not supported by Tracker. Thus, your >> QSparql code would have to support two cases: Tracker and Nepomuk. >> Putting that into the service directly makes way more sense. > I'm not clear what you mean here. I need to study how KDE Nepomuk uses > named graphs in order to think about how we can make Tracker and KDE > Nepomuk services inter-operate. How would we 'put that into a service > directly' without doing some sort of conversion between Nepomuk's > named graphs and Tracker's more flat triple based data? The Tracker > team do have plans to add better named graph support in the future, > and so if both projects can discuss how KDE Nepomuk is using named > graphs it would be pretty useful imho. > > -- Richard > >> >> On 11/08/2010 11:54 AM, Richard Dale wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Sebastian Trüg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> AFAIK Gnome uses Tracker only. It would, however, be very simple to >>>> write a wrapper service that provides the Tracker API from the Nepomuk >>>> system. That way Gnome and KDE apps could share their data. >>>> Nothing has been done here yet. As always the developer shortage in >>>> Nepomuk is the problem. >>> You can use QSparql ([email protected]:maemo-af/qsparql.git) to access >>> both Virtuoso, Tracker based stores and SPARQL endpoints with the same >>> Qt-style asynchronous api. It has drivers for both the DBus based >>> Tracker apis and the newer and faster 'Tracker direct' one. >>> >>> -- Richard >>> >>>> As far as Firefox is concerned: Mandriva is putting effort into that one >>>> again. Nothing has been released yet though. >>>> >>>> All in all: we need developers at all corners! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Sebastian >>>> >>>> On 11/08/2010 02:35 AM, Bruce Adams wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> I've been redirected here from the nepomuk-eclipse mailing list where >>>>> I was >>>>> originally >>>>> looking for information on the firefox extension that uses nepomuk. It >>>>> seems to >>>>> have fallen out of maintenance. >>>>> Does anyone know anything about it? >>>>> >>>>> My other question concerns integration of nepomuk with gnome. Gnome has >>>>> xesame >>>>> which seems a few steps >>>>> behind nepomuk. Is gnome likely to adopt nepomuk or go its own way? There >>>>> is an >>>>> old launch pad item about >>>>> adding nepomuk integration here, but its no more than a suggestion. >>>>> >>>>> http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12507/ >>>>> >>>>> Where I'm coming from is that I would like to create an application with >>>>> support >>>>> for tagging files but I would like it to >>>>> work with both gnome and kde natively. Okay, you can run a nepomuk server >>>>> and >>>>> still use gnome but it is not quite >>>>> the same. Do I need to write a platform independent wrapper library? >>>>> I'm also wondering about tagging web pages via firefox. >>>>> >>>>> I'm sure this is old ground. Perhaps someone could direct me towards some >>>>> more >>>>> recent information? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Bruce. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Nepomuk mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nepomuk mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nepomuk mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nepomuk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >> > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
