On 06/15/2011 05:13 PM, Valentin Rusu wrote: > hello, > i think that it would be better to let users change the properties they > need. a simple iterative comparison should find out what properies > changed then update them. another method would be based on the usage of > update hooks when a change in nepomuk attribute should be intercepted > then immediately applied to the file.
This is not the problem Smit is talking about. He wants to know which properties his system should support since we need a mapping of exif properties to Nepomuk properties. And his system is exactly that: it listens for changes in Nepomuk and propagates them to the files. > -- > valentin > > > Smit Shah <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hello, i am currently working on GSOC project entitled "Metadata > writeback" , where i focus on writing any metadata changes in > nepomuk to the file itself if its possible. for images (that too > Exif) specific i am using Exiv2 library to write the metadata > changes but since there are numerous tags/properties in Exif , i am > looking for the once that are likely to be changed as such , since > its unlikely that exposure or focus time will ever be changed, > > So i ask can you please list out all the exif properties which are > likely to be changed as most exif properties would never be changed > hence there is no need to write the metadata changes back to file > for those properties as such ? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
