> On June 24, 2011, 12:17 p.m., Sebastian Trueg wrote: > > This is a bit messy for my taste. So please put it in a branch and we will > > fix it in there.
Ok. branch is 'raptor2' - Artem ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101741/#review4123 ----------------------------------------------------------- On June 24, 2011, 11:09 a.m., Artem Serebriyskiy wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101741/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 24, 2011, 11:09 a.m.) > > > Review request for Nepomuk and Soprano. > > > Summary > ------- > > Port Raptor serializer to libraptor2 + provide test for serializers > > > Diffs > ----- > > backends/redland/redlandqueryresult.cpp dbddcba > cmake/modules/FindRaptor.cmake 6347647 > parsers/raptor/CMakeLists.txt 2adf527 > parsers/raptor/raptor-config.h.cmake dc35028 > parsers/raptor/raptorparser.h e6a7f99 > parsers/raptor/raptorparser.cpp 0aabb73 > serializers/raptor/raptorserializer.h 39037bb > serializers/raptor/raptorserializer.cpp 959f80a > test/CMakeLists.txt a17805a > test/serializetest.h PRE-CREATION > test/serializetest.cpp PRE-CREATION > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101741/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > There were no tests in soprano for serializers. So I wrote one( based on > parsertest). This, unfortunately, means that it is not possible to rely on > this test to detect if port to raptor2 is correct. > Nevertheless, evrything is compiling on my system and this new test is > successfully passed. > > > Thanks, > > Artem > >
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
