-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102216/#review5404
-----------------------------------------------------------


This review has been submitted with commit 
998619b4e4879cc14418e8ee64af9b5dff872c42 by Sebastian Trueg to branch master.

- Commit


On Aug. 4, 2011, 3:05 p.m., Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102216/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 4, 2011, 3:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk and Strigi.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> A short while ago I introduced the new method 
> AnalysisResult::finishIndexChild so clients can properly update the indexing 
> status. I figured I would only have to call this method in analysers that 
> afterwards continue to index the main file. However, it turns out that the 
> problem also arises when other analysers are run after the one not calling 
> finishIndexChild. This would for example result in a wrong depth for SHA1 
> checksums which would then be rejected by Nepomuk.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   lib/endanalyzers/arendanalyzer.cpp 2e7c371 
>   lib/endanalyzers/bz2endanalyzer.cpp a4b4ba7 
>   lib/endanalyzers/cpioendanalyzer.cpp 74e12a4 
>   lib/endanalyzers/gzipendanalyzer.cpp 947579e 
>   lib/endanalyzers/lzmaendanalyzer.cpp 4515434 
>   lib/endanalyzers/odfendanalyzer.cpp 5227925 
>   lib/endanalyzers/oleendanalyzer.cpp 7c2105b 
>   lib/endanalyzers/pdfendanalyzer.cpp a0e4111 
>   lib/endanalyzers/rpmendanalyzer.cpp fe248e7 
>   lib/endanalyzers/sdfendanalyzer.cpp bb0bbc4 
>   lib/endanalyzers/tarendanalyzer.cpp 4601107 
>   lib/endanalyzers/zipendanalyzer.cpp 1ab4d91 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102216/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Indexing works properly with patch. Checksums are saved to Nepomuk again.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sebastian
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk

Reply via email to