-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102301/#review5972
-----------------------------------------------------------



nepomuk/kcm/statuswidget.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102301/#comment5279>

    this is weird. Why not just 
"setFileIndexerSuspended(m_fileIndexerService->isSuspended())"?



nepomuk/kcm/statuswidget.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102301/#comment5280>

    My main point before was about code duplication. You should use 
setFileIndexerSuspended here instead of calling setText again.



nepomuk/kcm/statuswidget.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102301/#comment5281>

    This name suggests that the file indexer will actually be suspended or 
resumed which is not the case. I would rather use something like 
"updateSuspendResumeButtonText"


- Sebastian


On Aug. 24, 2011, 8:17 a.m., Smit Shah wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102301/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 24, 2011, 8:17 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Now you can pause or resume strigi and see the currently indexed file.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   nepomuk/controller/systray.cpp 9e058f8 
>   nepomuk/kcm/CMakeLists.txt 313205a 
>   nepomuk/kcm/nepomukserverkcm.cpp b7dcab9 
>   nepomuk/kcm/statuswidget.h 0440745 
>   nepomuk/kcm/statuswidget.cpp 4798d7f 
>   nepomuk/kcm/statuswidget.ui 359ec6e 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102301/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> paused and resume couple of times and it works perfectly.
> 
> 
> Screenshots
> -----------
> 
> See
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102301/s/223/
> see again
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102301/s/224/
> with current status
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102301/s/226/
> 
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102301/s/227/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Smit
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk

Reply via email to