Is there any update on this? -- Marty K.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 16:05, Sebastian Trueg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > we are thinking about including the geo ontology into SDO[1] for being > installed alongside other default ontologies on every linux system. > > However, for it to be used in Nepomuk[2] we require an extension. Of > course we could just put them into a separate ontology but I feel that > it would be cleaner to have them in the geo onto if at all possible. > > The actual extension we need are properly set ranges on the literal > properties as we treat properties without range definitions as > "abstract" properties that cannot be set. (On the desktop we need to be > a little more closed-worldly than on the web) > > Is this something you would consider adding to the official ontology? > And if so would it be possible for us to package a trig'ified version of > the geo ontology in SDO? What is the licence of the onto? > > (by trig'ified I mean that the ontology would be put into its own graph > accompanied by a metadata graph the way we do with all our ontologies.) > > Cheers, > Sebastian > > [1] http://nepomuk.kde.org/ > [2] http://oscaf.sf.net/ > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
