On 09/15/2011 10:07 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Thursday 15 September 2011 17:44:20 Stephen Kelly wrote: >> Does that mean that nepomuk should be removed from the frameworks branch? I >> had a look, and I'm not sure if the history is kept etc. > > In any case I wouldn't remove it, from the Frameworks effort POV it just > means > we don't have to bother about Nepomuk. Either way we shouldn't remove it from > the kdelibs repo because if the new repo got done properly the plan was to > use > git grafts to get the full history for the splitted repos, and if wasn't done > properly, then it's likely that the nepomuk lords will be happy to find the > old history from the kdelibs repo somehow.
Don't worry, all the history is there, both from kdelibs and kde-runtime. :) >> Removing it from frameworks would mean that it doesn't get updated as things >> change, but changing nepomuk things in the frameworks branch wouldn't be >> mergable anyway. > > I'd say we should just comment it out from the build right away (depends how > many other libs depend on it though). > > Regards. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
