what did you compile? git branch KDE/4.7? or some release tarball?
On 10/04/2011 07:42 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > I tried the patch and seems that is working. I'm not totally sure > because one Nepomuk's service is crashing and nepomukserver don't stop > without killing it :). > > I'm totally new to this so I don't know if I done something wrong or if > the next information is useful. I will try to improve my C++ skills. > ------------------- > > Application: Nepomuk Service Stub (nepomukservicestub), signal: > Segmentation fault > > [KCrash Handler] > > #6 0x00007faec8f3df4f in Nepomuk::Repository::close (this=0x7e6ac0) at > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/repository.cpp:86 > > #7 0x00007faec8f3e07d in Nepomuk::Repository::~Repository > (this=0x7e6ac0, __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/repository.cpp:75 > > #8 0x00007faec8f3e159 in Nepomuk::Repository::~Repository > (this=0x7e6ac0, __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/repository.cpp:76 > > #9 0x00007faec8d01d5f in Soprano::Server::ServerCore::~ServerCore() () > from /usr/lib64/libsopranoserver.so.1 > > #10 0x00007faec8f3ce45 in Nepomuk::Core::~Core (this=0x74b150, > __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/nepomukcore.cpp:45 > > #11 0x00007faec8f3cec9 in Nepomuk::Core::~Core (this=0x74b150, > __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/nepomukcore.cpp:48 > > #12 0x00007faed74fb084 in QObjectPrivate::deleteChildren() () from > /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4 > > #13 0x00007faed74ffd32 in QObject::~QObject() () from > /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4 > > #14 0x00007faec8f3c0b3 in ~Storage (this=<value optimized out>, > __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/storage.cpp:54 > > #15 Nepomuk::Storage::~Storage (this=<value optimized out>, > __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/storage.cpp:56 > > #16 0x00007faed74fb084 in QObjectPrivate::deleteChildren() () from > /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4 > > #17 0x00007faed74ffd32 in QObject::~QObject() () from > /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4 > > #18 0x0000000000404d59 in Nepomuk::ServiceControl::~ServiceControl > (this=0x74a2f0, __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/servicestub/servicecontrol.cpp:41 > > #19 0x00007faed74fb084 in QObjectPrivate::deleteChildren() () from > /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4 > > #20 0x00007faed74ffd32 in QObject::~QObject() () from > /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4 > > #21 0x00007faed52b5e22 in QApplication::~QApplication() () from > /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 > > #22 0x00000000004044fc in main (argc=36, argv=0x7fff2e34bd78) at > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/servicestub/main.cpp:105 > > -------------------- > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Ignacio Serantes <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Sebastian Trüg <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 10/04/2011 01:24 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Sebastian Trüg <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > Ok, the bug is fixed now. :) > > > > > > I will try to find time to compile Nepomuk sources and update > my system > > to test the patch. This will be my first time doing something > like this > > so I'm starting to pray... > > > > On the other side, what about the configuration issue? > > What is the problem? IMHO the configuration is easy: index external > > media or not index them. Manually added information is completely > unrelated to this and cannot be influenced by any configuration. > > > The problem is last night I changed from "Index filex on all > removable devices" to "Ignore all removable media" and all my > resources was deleted again. I do the test with one HD connected and > the other disconnected and resources of both HDs was deleted. By the > way I don't know if you consider Bangarand metadata manual or not :). > > I will try to reproduce the problem. > > -- > Best wishes, > Ignacio > > > > > > -- > Best wishes, > Ignacio > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
