This part of the discussion is a bit moot, it was discussed several months ago, but lets summarize.
> ecryptfs, encfs or dm-crypt + LUKS as well - when its running, decryption > is setup and working. I see no way around this. Decrypting only the current activity, unmount on device lock. > What could be done is some access restrictions like KWallet does. Access restrictions are not security for direct device access. > So for what I gather, what you plan to work on is the case, when its not > the complete home directory that is encrypted, but another directory, > maybe a sub directory of it. All of that is already implemented. The only remaining part is nepomuk integration with private activities. > I don´t know whether having mutiple virtuoso databases is something thats > feasible at all tough. Not really since then you can't make cross queries. > When you store filename and types of files thats IMHO already quite some > information leak. Yes, if we are not able to go around that, it will have to be communicated to the users. > Would it be possible to have encryption on single Virtuoso database > entries? This was one of the ideas we had. But we can't really count on Virtuoso people to do it soonish - we need it now. -- Cheerio, Ivan -- While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words Dying to believe in what you heard I was staring straight into the shining sun _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
