I tried this query. While it is of course pointless to have the additional hasTag without a "FILTER(?v2!=?v3)" it does not seem to pose a problem to virtuoso here.
What exactly do you mean by "screwing up"? On 03/20/2012 08:25 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > Hey Sebastian > > If you get a chance please look at this - > > 1. > nepomukqueryservice(21826)/nepomuk (query service) > Nepomuk::Query::SearchRunnable::run: "<?xml version="1.0"?><query > limit="6" offset="0" fullTextScoring="false" > fullTextScoringOrder="desc" flags=""><and><type > > uri="http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/2007/08/15/nao#Tag"/><comparison > property="http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/2007/08/15/nao#hasTag"; > comparator=":" inverted="true"/><comparison > property="http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/2007/08/15/nao#hasTag"; > comparator=":" aggregate="count" sortWeight="1" sortOrder="desc" > inverted="true"/></and></query> > 2. > " "select distinct ?r where { { ?r a > <http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/2007/08/15/nao#Tag> . ?v2 > <http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/2007/08/15/nao#hasTag> ?r > . ?v3 > <http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/2007/08/15/nao#hasTag> ?r > . } . ?r > <http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/2007/08/15/nao#userVisible> > ?v1 . FILTER(?v1>0) . } ORDER BY DESC ( count(?v3) ) LIMIT 6" > > > The query has this twice, and it's screwing up virtuoso - > > ?v2 <http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/2007/08/15/nao#hasTag> ?r . > ?v3 <http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/2007/08/15/nao#hasTag> ?r . > > Do you think you could update the Query Generator to handle cases like this? _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
