I just saw that you only copied the header and link to "nepomukdatamanagement". In that case there is no need for the header since you depend on kde-runtime anyway. :)
On 04/14/2012 10:21 PM, Peter Penz wrote: > On 04/14/2012 10:02 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: >> On 04/06/2012 02:48 PM, Peter Penz wrote: > [...] >>> - Invoking ResourceWatcher::addResource() after invoking >>> ResourceWatcher::start() has no effect. As workaround before adding a >>> resource I needed to invoke ResourceWatcher::stop(), add the resource >>> and invoke ResourceWatcher::start() again. The problem with this >>> workaround is the performance: Calling stop() clears e.g. 15000 items >>> and calling start() after adding one resource adds 15001 items again. In >>> the case of the directory with 20000 this might take up a few seconds >>> for each (!) of the items in the upper-range. >> >> I implemented support for that a while ago. Where did you copy the RW >> from? > > Sounds good ;-) I've copied it from the KDE/4.8 branch due to the > kdelibs-freeze - I did not check the other branches, but probably you > pushed it to the frameworks branch? > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
