----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106256/#review18215 -----------------------------------------------------------
In principal this is a good idea but IMHO should be combined with actual re-indexing with new indexer versions (strigi-plugin-based). After all files will not be reindexed even if there is a new or better indexer plugin available. Also we still have the problem of files that changed or appeared in between Nepomuk runs. - Sebastian Trueg On Aug. 28, 2012, 6:09 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106256/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 28, 2012, 6:09 p.m.) > > > Review request for Nepomuk and Sebastian Trueg. > > > Description > ------- > > Only check for changes if the strigi version changes, cause in that case > their may be a new plugin or an earlier plugin may have been fixed. > > > Diffs > ----- > > services/fileindexer/CMakeLists.txt f9eea59 > services/fileindexer/fileindexer.cpp af8be4d > services/fileindexer/fileindexerconfig.h 1113220 > services/fileindexer/fileindexerconfig.cpp 2ca973c > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106256/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Vishesh Handa > >
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
