> I am trying to confirm the proper license for nepomuk-core. It > appears it is mostly LGPL licensed, but some files are under the GPL > license. This would make the package as a whole GPL licensed as I > understand it. Is this correct?
It is a policy of all kdelibs to be lgpl. The files in nepomuk that are not, are gpol probably by mistake, and it needs to be fixed. Ch! -- Money can't buy happiness, but neither can poverty. -- Leo Rosten
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
