Anyone?
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Vishesh Handa <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey everyone > > How about we name the "nepomukserver"? It's a really stupid name cause it > isn't a server. The server part is actually the storage service. That's the > service everyone talks to. > > The nepomukserver is just a service coordinator. I was thinking of > renaming it 'nepomuk_control', similar to 'aknoadi_control'. However that > also might be slightly confusing since we a 'nepomukcontroller'. > > Opinions? > > -- > Vishesh Handa > > -- Vishesh Handa
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
