-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109010/#review27648
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


You're quite right - this was a merge error, I think. 

- Simeon Bird


On Feb. 18, 2013, 5:06 p.m., Gabriel Poesia wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109010/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 18, 2013, 5:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The IgnoringKInotify::filterWatch method, before anything else, checks if the 
> path should be watched according to the configuration (calling 
> FileIndexerConfig::self()->shouldFolderBeWatched( path )). If not, it returns 
> false. But if the path should not be indexed, according to FileIndexerConfig, 
> it returns the result of another call to "shouldFolderBeWatched", passing the 
> same path. But this should always return true, or the method would have 
> returned false before. Thus, the second call seems unnecessary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   services/filewatch/nepomukfilewatch.cpp 824adca 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109010/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Compiled.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gabriel Poesia
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk

Reply via email to