> Just pushed. Thanks - it all seems to work for me now.
>> >> >> Problems - >> >> >> 1. I've kinda broken the /servicecontrol name and description >> >> >> functions. >> >> >> Implementing this would require parsing the desktop files, which I >> >> >> still >> >> >> haven't done. >> > >> > >> > Still trying to fix this. I'll merge after fixing this and some more >> > testing. >> > The problem is that I require the servicename in order to fetch its desktop > file. I'm not sure how to get that name. My current method is that of using > the name provided by KAboutData which is the same, but could be different :/ What happens if it is different? I guess the servicecontrol function just returns the wrong thing? >> > Any comments on renaming nepomukserver? >> >> How about "nepomukmanager"? > > > I meant, should we rename it at all? Or let it be called nepomukserver. I would say yes: the cost seems essentially zero, and as you say, it isn't a server, so the name is misleading. But it's your call Simeon _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
