Hi Denis, The proposal looks quite nice. If I may, I'd suggest a shorthand for the hasTag - for example #dog to mean hasTag:dog.*
One of the reasons (apart from greater usability) is that according to the proposal hasTag:red herring would mean either - hasTag:"red herring" - hasTag:red contains:herring (implied property contains) - hasTag:red hasTag:herring (implied property hasTag) By allowing a shorthand for hasTag, you remove the need for that property to be an implied one. Cheerio, Ivan * firefox uses + for this, but I guess that # is more widely known thanks to twitter-like services. -- So much complexity in software comes from trying to make one thing do two things. -- Ryan Singer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
