----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110819/#review33696 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! I guess you need it in KGet. Though these kind of functions really shouldn't be used. They would block for quite some time depending on how many results are being returned. - Vishesh Handa On June 3, 2013, 5:27 p.m., David Narváez wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110819/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 3, 2013, 5:27 p.m.) > > > Review request for Nepomuk. > > > Description > ------- > > This should have been commented together with > b3ea8cd17c926d725954dd09f30cc93dbda1181c > > > Diffs > ----- > > rcgen/codegenerator.cpp b0f8dd7 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110819/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Haven't been able to compile and test the code generator after this patch but > what I would expect is that the header file will not include the > all<ResourceType>s() method. Can try later if needed. > > > Thanks, > > David Narváez > >
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
