On Sun, June 9, 2013 16:11:27 Simeon Bird wrote: > > On June 9, 2013, 10:27 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > Being past the Feature Freeze doesn't seem a good idea to me to remove a > > > feature. > It isn't really removing a feature - the code in question does nothing at > all that I can see, and hasn't done for a while. In fact, I'm not sure the > FontAnalyzer really did anything even when strigi was in use, because > /usr/share/fonts was not indexed by default. Its just removing dead code. > > It *is* a dependency change though, and I'm not sure what the rules are for > that. I guess it could be made optional, but since it doesn't do anything > that doesn't seem really worth the effort.
Speaking just to the dependency change, my feeling is that it's always acceptable to remove a dependency. It would not be acceptable to add or upgrade a dependency after the dep. freeze though. Regards, - Michael Pyne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
