-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I was reading the CVE (cve.mitre.org) website and they seem very big
on distinguishing between an "Exposure" and a "Vulnerability." Do
others agree with this? Is this reflected in the way that Nessus and
the NASL scripts are currently architected? Should the output for
XML reflect that? Should <information> be left along and <exposure>
and <vulnerabilty> wrapped inside of that tag??
- --Randy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBPIkmuiGJH83OL4I4EQJ3+ACg8G3kjH8hmnsK6QbIcVTKsyF8FNsAoLQu
daOHuXIkSDvJkzOq3BKG6jMY
=YSce
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
