Are you talking about LAN performance?  In my experience, running on an
ultra10/400MHZ vs an intel chip (in this case, an 866), the competition is
pretty even when running a scan with default configurations... obviously it
doesn't take much CPU time to do most of what is being done.  Available RAM
is usually the deciding factor.  On top of that, if you're scanning across a
WAN link that's < 45Mb, then both machines are going to look pretty even
with each other.  However, if, for instance you're running 50 simultaneous
scans, 20 checks at a time, with DOS attacks enabled, on an otherwise
un-utilized 100Mb network, then I think you'll see the x86 based machine win
in the end (assuming equal amounts of RAM) over anything that is workstation
class sun hardware (which is what I am assuming that you're running).  IMHO
workstation class sun hardware sucks--largely due to front-side-bus that
runs about as fast as my old 486 motherboard does.  This, of course, is
quite apparent when the majority of what you are doing is cpu and memory
interaction with a network card.  

Sun says that they have a superior backplane, (they claim on the web page
that it's the fastest PCI bus around)... and perhaps with more tuning in the
code, nessus would run better on sun hardware... but in my experience,
you're better off with a beefy x86 based system... especially if that system
has a 64 bit PCI slot for a NIC.

Don't want to sound like I'm biased here... but the proof's in the pudding.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nessus ultrasparc 500mhz performance vs intel 850


Was wondering if anyone had a feeling, opinion, gripe or brain  fart  when
thinking about a sun ultrasparc 500mhz running Solaris 8 vs an Intel 850mhz
running FREEBSD.

I know that all chips are not made alike, and that some 500mhz chip MIGHT
run faster than another 850mhz chip,
so, anyone have any real numbers on both?

--
Michael Scheidell
SECNAP Network Security, LLC
(561) 368-9561 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.secnap.net

Reply via email to