On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 12:35:05PM -0600, John McCain wrote:
> I am considering upgrading to 1.1.x because there are many new features
> (not to mention plugins) that I want.
>
> I know the official word on 1.1.x is that it is recommended, but not to be
> considered bug-free. I don't expect to delegate the decision of using
> "experimental" software with this question, but Nessus is so well done that
> I have confidence with it that I wouldn't have with other projects. What
> is the metric for establishing that 1.0.x is stable? Is it simply time?
It's the fact is has not moved during the last months.
FWIW, Nessus 1.1.14 will be out tonight, then it will be followed by
Nessus 1.2.0 if all goes well. So 1.1.x is not as "experimental" as it
used to be.
-- Renaud
