On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:47:12PM -0500, EnergyLad wrote: > > I notice that even with safe_checks on, this script runs a destructive > check. (Or at least, it reports back as though it ran in destructive > mode.) > > I know that this is someone else's script, but will anyone care if I just > fix it and check it back in? Or rather, should I care if anyone cares, so > long as it works as it should?
There was a typo in the plugin - it actually ran in safe check mode, but reports the intrusive report. Here's the patch : 127c127 < security_hole(port:port, data:report); --- > security_hole(port:port, data:rep); (in the previous case, 'report' is NULL as it's not defined, and as a result the plugin uses the default report output as a fallback)
