On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Pavel Kankovsky wrote: > A test that has broken its subject is a good test. > A test that has not broken its subject might be a good test on an > unbreakable subject as well as a bad (insufficient, incorrect, > improper...) test on a breakable subject.
s/subject/target/ *blush* --Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ] "Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation." _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
