On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 05:36:18PM -0800, Noah Roberts wrote:
> Why would code written in nasl have to be gpled?  I think it is pretty 
> commonly accepted that interpreting code with a GPLed interpreter 
> doesn't make the code GPLed.  I must be missing something

Because NASL is not so much a language than big set of functions
which are under the GPL.



                                -- Renaud
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

Reply via email to