ssh listening on 22

results||xx.xx.xx.xx|general/tcp|12634|Security Note|\nThe output of
"uname -a" is :\nLinux hostname 2.6.2 #1 SMP Sun Feb 15 21:46:14 UTC
2004 i686 Pentium III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux\n\nLocal
security checks have been enabled for this host.\n

Thanks

tom


On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:29:17 -0500, Nicolas Pouvesle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> verbose mode increases (debug) informations the report will give you not
> the log files.
> 
> So with verbose level, what is the result of ssh_get_info.nasl in the
> report (plugin id : 12634) ?
> And on what port your ssh server is listenning ?
> 
> 
> Nicolas
> 
> 
> Tom Lapp wrote:
> > George,
> >     I have dependencies enabled.  Here is some output (log level
> > verbose).  All of the 200+ GLSA checks report the same error.  Thanks.
> >
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:05 2005][18630] user nessus : session will be saved
> > as /var/lib/nessus/users/nessus/sessions/20050129-134405-index
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:13 2005][18630] user nessus starts a new attack.
> > Target(s) : xx.xx.xx.xx, with max_hosts = 16 and max_checks = 10
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:14 2005][18630] user nessus : testing xx.xx.xx.xx
> > (xx.xx.xx.xx) [18640]
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:14 2005][18640] user nessus : new KB will be saved
> > as /var/lib/nessus/users/nessus/kbs/xx.xx.xx.xx
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:14 2005][18640] user nessus : launching
> > ssh_settings.nasl against xx.xx.xx.xx [18641]
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:14 2005][18640] ssh_settings.nasl (process 18641)
> > finished its job in 0.239 seconds
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:14 2005][18640] user nessus : launching
> > find_service.nes against xx.xx.xx.xx [18642]
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:14 2005][18640] find_service.nes (process 18642)
> > finished its job in 0.172 seconds
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:14 2005][18640] user nessus : launching
> > ssh_get_info.nasl against xx.xx.xx.xx [18643]
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:15 2005][18640] ssh_get_info.nasl (process 18643)
> > finished its job in 0.579 seconds
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:15 2005][18640] user nessus : Not launching
> > gentoo_GLSA-200410-26.nasl against xx.xx.xx.xx because the key
> > Host/Gentoo/qpkg-l
> > ist is missing (this is not an error)
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:15 2005][18640] user nessus : Not launching
> > gentoo_GLSA-200406-01.nasl against xx.xx.xx.xx because the key
> > Host/Gentoo/qpkg-l
> > ist is missing (this is not an error)
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:15 2005][18640] user nessus : Not launching
> > gentoo_GLSA-200402-01.nasl against xx.xx.xx.xx because the key
> > Host/Gentoo/qpkg-l
> > ist is missing (this is not an error)
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:15 2005][18640] user nessus : Not launching
> > gentoo_GLSA-200404-01.nasl against xx.xx.xx.xx because the key
> > Host/Gentoo/qpkg-l
> > ist is missing (this is not an error)
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:15 2005][18640] user nessus : Not launching
> > gentoo_GLSA-200407-12.nasl against xx.xx.xx.xx because the key
> > Host/Gentoo/qpkg-l
> > ist is missing (this is not an error)
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:15 2005][18640] user nessus : Not launching
> > gentoo_GLSA-200408-17.nasl against xx.xx.xx.xx because the key
> > Host/Gentoo/qpkg-l
> > ist is missing (this is not an error)
> > [Sat Jan 29 13:44:15 2005][18640] user nessus : Not launching
> > gentoo_GLSA-200408-19.nasl against xx.xx.xx.xx because the key
> > Host/Gentoo/qpkg-l
> > ist is missing (this is not an error)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:31:19 -0500, George Theall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 12:07:32PM -0500, Tom Lapp wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I am recieving the following error when scanning a gentoo box with
> >>>GLSA plugins.  I'm not sure what I am missing.  I have
> >>>gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre8-r1 installed.
> >>
> >>Have you explicitly enabled plugin #12634 (ssh_get_info.nasl) or at
> >>least enabled dependencies when running the scan? If so, what does it
> >>report?
> >>
> >>By the way, gentoolkit isn't used for local security checks. Instead,
> >>ssh_get_info.nasl merely do
> >
> > es a find on /var/db/pkg; ie, it runs
> >
> >>'find /var/db/pkg/ -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 2 -printf "%P\n"'.
> >>
> >>George
> >>--
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Nessus mailing list
> >>[email protected]
> >>http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nessus mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nessus mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
>
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

Reply via email to