On Wed, 24 May 2006, Josh Zlatin wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Larry wrote:
Because it did not show up in the report... that's why :)
Do subsequent Nessus scans repeatably miss the XEXCH50 flaw too?
One other thing I forgot to mention, you might want to take a look in
the kbs to verify that the 'SMTP/'+port+'/broken' (where port is the SMTP port)
item does not exist and verify that the port was recognized and
accessible during the scan.
--
- Josh
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
