At 12:10 PM 8/22/2006, Lee Parkes wrote:
>Hi,
>In the course of our work my colleagues and I use Nessus as the primary 
>vulnerability assesment tool. However, in this age of 'risk management' the
>upper management have decided that we should use at least two distinct scanning
>tools. Whilst we use Qualys for remote scans, we can't use it on most on-site
>jobs. 
>My question is, is there another scanner, free or payware, that people
>recommend as being of comparable quality to Nessus? The preference is for a 
>tool that isn't based on Nessus so that we have two independent scans.

Hi Lee, 

Although I firmly respect anyone's wishes to use two scanners, I would
consider the following thoughts: 

- You are absolutely right to make sure that the second vendor
  does not base their scans or data off of Nessus. And even if
  they don't run the "nessus" engine, you should pick the last 10 or
  so Bugtraq IDs or CVEs and see when the vendor added them. You may
  or may not be surprised how often new checks in 3rd party scanners
  get added once they hit the Nessus registered feed. 

- Instead of two scanners, I would really argue to use two or more
  technologies. Assume for a second that two network scanner technologies
  are roughly equal. What value does adding credentialed patch auditing
  to the mix? When Nessus connects to port 80 and starts doing web 
  analysis, this is a completely different process then when it logs
  in via a domain or credentials and performs a patch audit. 

- If there is a question in the quality of the scans or the accuracy 
  of the results, I would highly recommend that a passive continuous
  solution like our Passive Vulnerability Scanner be used. Passive
  network monitoring is real-time and sees everything on the network
  regardless of port, protocol or client-side firewalls. 

Ron Gula, CTO
Tenable Network Security
http://www.nessus.org
http://www.tenablesecurity.com
http://blog.tenablesecurity.com



_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

Reply via email to