On Feb 1, 2007, at 5:14 PM, Zate Berg wrote:
sorry to reply to my own message but I have found a little more info.
in solaris.inc we have the following :
function solaris_check_patch(release, arch, patch, package,
obsoleted_by)
notice package, then obsoleted_by.
In the nasl for solaris9_110938.nasl there is :
e = solaris_check_patch(release:"5.9", arch:"sparc",
patch:"110938-22", obsoleted_by:"", package:"SUNWed SUNWedag
SUNWedagx SUNWedcom SUNWesae SUNWesaem SUNWesagt SUNWesamn
SUNWesasc SUNWescaa SUNWescam SUNWescix SUNWescli SUNWesclt
SUNWescom SUNWescon SUNWesdb SUNWesjp SUNWesjrm SUNWesmcp SUNWesmod
SUNWesmsg SUNWesora SUNWessa SUNWessdk SUNWessmn SUNWessrv
SUNWessta SUNWessts SUNWessvc SUNWesweb SUNWeswga SUNWeswgs
SUNWmeta SUNWsycfd");
basically it has obsoleted_by , then package.
This would be a problem right ? Or am I looking in the wrong areas ?
No, it would not be the cause of the problem -- the order of the
arguments do not matter.
We're investigating this particular issue and will come back to you
shortly.
-- Renaud
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
