On 03/19/07 17:48, Steve Reagan wrote:
With my McAfee software disabled, ScanLite did not report a hole when I scanned with plugin ID 16193 (anti-virus check). However, when I scanned with plugin ID 12107 (McAfee anti-virus check - a dependent of ID 16193), it shows a hole. Is there any reason that scanning plugin 16193 from a Unix/Win client would show the McAfee hole and the ScanLite would not, considering ScanLite shows the hole when the dependency McAfee plugin (ID 12107) is scanned directly?
I've never used ScanLite, but this makes me wonder if it knows about script dependencies. Do you get the expected results if you explicitly enable 12107 and 16193 (along with the other necessary dependencies)?
George -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list [email protected] http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
