[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen the same behavior. Previously, I had always attributed it to a difference between the port scan and the plugin checks.
Does this mean that the new config parameters do not apply to the portscanning part of a scan ?
If that's the case I find it a bit odd.... Knut
*********************************************************************** NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it, may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the e-mail and attached documents. Thank you. ***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list [email protected] http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
