This is happening to us as well, and I'm a direct-feed customer.  I just
sent Renaud a message about this.  If someone from Tenable support will
send me a PGP key, I'll send the NBE file and HTML report.  
 
Nice thing about this particular scan: one of the plugins lists all the
installed packages, so the proof that all 18 findings (in this case) are
false-positives is in the report itself.
 
John Scherff
24 Hour Fitness


________________________________

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Crabshack
        Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:00 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Possible False Positives Scanning 64 bit Red Hat
Systems
        
        
        I have googled and searched the list, and haven't found anything
related to what I am seeing. I am scanning some 64 Bit Red Hat boxes,
and they are coming up with a number of False Positive vulnerabilities.
I scanned one of these machines a few weeks ago, and didn't notice this
problem. I'm on the 14 day delay, and I just updated yesterday.
        
        One of the many plugins that are coming back vulnerable is
18441. Looking at the code, it appears that this check is looking for
the following:
        
        dbus-0.22-12.EL.2
        dbus-devel-0.22-12.EL.2
        dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.2
        dbus-python-0.22-12.EL.2
        dbus-x11-0.22-12.EL.2
        
        But when I look on the affected system, these packages do not
appear to be present:
        
        [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qa --qf
'%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}|%{EPOCH}\n' | grep dbus
        dbus-devel-0.22-12.EL.9|(none)
        dbus-0.22-12.EL.9|(none)
        dbus-0.22-12.EL.9|(none)
        dbus-x11-0.22-12.EL.9|(none)
        dbus-python-0.22-12.EL.9|(none)
        dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.9|(none)
        dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.9|(none)
        
        Another example, # 19390. This check is looking for:
        
        irb-1.8.1-7.EL4.1
        ruby-1.8.1-7.EL4.1
        ruby-devel-1.8.1-7.EL4.1
        ruby-docs-1.8.1-7.EL4.1
        ruby-libs-1.8.1-7.EL4.1
        ruby-mode-1.8.1-7.EL4.1
        ruby-tcltk-1.8.1-7.EL4.1
        
        On my machine:
        
        [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qa --qf
'%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}|%{EPOCH}\n' | grep ruby
        ruby-libs-1.8.1-7.EL4.8|(none)
        [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qa --qf
'%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}|%{EPOCH}\n' | grep irb
        [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
        
        Other information from the machine being scanned:
        
        cat /etc/redhat-release = Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4
(Nahant Update 5)
        uname -m = x86_64
        uname -a = Linux thebox.somewhere.net 2.6.9-55.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri
Apr 20 16:36:54 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
        
        Scanner Host:
        
        nessus (Nessus) 3.0.5 for Linux
        2.6.9-55.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 17:03:35 EDT 2007 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linux
        Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 (Nahant Update 5)
        
        This is my first post to the list, so if you need more info,
please let me know.
        
        Thanks.
        
        
        
        

________________________________

        Live Earth is coming.  Learn more about the hottest summer event
- only on MSN. Check it out!
<http://liveearth.msn.com?source=msntaglineliveearthwlm>  

_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

Reply via email to