On 03/ 8/11 06:25 PM, Alex Lam S.L. wrote:
Under ForkJoinPool.java:
* readers must tolerate null slots. To avoid flailing during
should it be "failing" (extraneous "l")?
I actually flagged this in my original review, but put it aside as I
guessed it was kinda correct. The array is sized large enough so as not
to have it grow continuously as new workers are added. I guess
'flailing' refers to the perceived trashing if this were to happen.
-Chris.
Alex.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:17 PM,<chris.hega...@oracle.com> wrote:
Changeset: 63509149c027
Author: dl
Date: 2011-03-08 18:16 +0000
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/63509149c027
7023006: Reduce unnecessary thread activity in ForkJoinPool
Reviewed-by: chegar, dholmes
! src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java
! src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinTask.java
! src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinWorkerThread.java
