Hi Chris, >>> Will adding the ability to send ping(ByteBuffer) be sufficient for your >>> usage? If so, then I think we should add it, but not pong. The >>> implementation will automatically send a pong message in response to >>> receiving a ping. OK? >> >> Yes, ping(ByteBuffer) is sufficient for us. > > I assume you will also need a way to distinguish that the incoming data is > from a pong message, in response to your ping, right?
I'm not sure what you mean. If you mean, that we need to distinguish it in the method WebSocket.Incoming.onBinary(WebSocket, ByteBuffer), then no. I expect that this method is only used to process binary message. For pong messages I would expect a new method: WebSocket.Incoming.onPong(WebSocket, ByteBuffer). Currently we don't process the pong messages on the client. And there are no plans to do it in the near future. Best regards, Andrej Golovnin
