This bug talks about not only javadoc, but the actual code as well. It
looks like someone has already hit all of that, so this is the only
thing left.
What you've proposed looks ok. Did you make the javadocs target to test?
Brad
On 11/5/2015 7:42 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hi, i wanted to start an discussion/review-process some time ago, see
second-try below.
Is there someone who wants to discuss/review this javadoc-only change?
Else, should i link my result as reference into the JBS?
-- Sebastian
On 10/27/2015 05:28 AM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
Hello,
Actually I am searching through the JBS for low hanging fruits.
Right now i am looking through the openjdk-sources and try to evaluate
if i can make something about JDK-5108778.
Please find my webrevs for the jdk(net) repos at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/5108778/net/webrev.00/
The changes are javadoc only.
-- Sebastian
