Thanks for the test Ramanand. One possibility here is to enhance an existing test to check for your condition.

I think test/java/net/InetAddress/B6246242.java is a suitable edit. You can add your bug ID to the @bug tag. Would that work ?

Regards,
Sean.

On 11/02/2016 02:37, Ramanand Patil wrote:
Hi Sean,

Thank you. I have updated copyright year to the earlier patch and added a 
simple test case to cover this bug.
Please review the updated Webrev: 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8135259/webrev.01/

Regards,
Ramanand.

-----Original Message-----
From: Seán Coffey
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 7:47 PM
To: Ivan Gerasimov; Ramanand Patil; OpenJDK Network Dev list
Subject: Re: [PING] RFR: JDK-8135259: InetAddress.getAllByName only reports "unknown 
error" instead of actual cause

(dropping core-libs)

src change looks good to me also Ramanand. Will you also be adding a testcase 
to cover this ? I'm sure you could find one in the test base for editing.

Regards,
Sean.

On 10/02/16 13:44, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hi Ramanand!

Your fix looks good to me.

I'm forwarding your request to net-dev@openjdk.java.net which is
probably more appropriate to review this fix.
It would be good, if net-dev people can confirm they're Okay with the
fix.

Sincerely yours,
Ivan


On 10.02.2016 10:08, Ramanand Patil wrote:
Hi all,

Please help me in getting this review done.

Regards,
Ramanand.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ramanand Patil
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 10:46 PM
To: core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RFR: JDK-8135259: InetAddress.getAllByName only reports
"unknown error" instead of actual cause

Hi all
   Please review the fix for bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8135259

Bug Description: Attempts to resolve a host unknown to the DNS server
cause an UnknownHostException stating "unknown error" instead of
"Name or service not known".

Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8135259/webrev.00/

Fix: Using a function call directly "gai_strerror(gai_error)" instead
of using the function pointer which was declared but not initialized.
Apart from this I have removed few other unused variables and
function pointers. Brief description of how this bug was introduced
is added to the bug comment.

Regards,

Ramanand.



Reply via email to